SEC Filing | Predictive Oncology

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Download XBRL

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________________________ to

Commission File Number: 000-54361

BioDrain Medical, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Minnesota		33-1007393
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

2915 Commers Drive, Suite 900		Eagan, Minnesota 55121
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

651-389-4800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

2060 Centre Pointe Boulevard, Suite 7, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

¨ Yes x No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of May 10, 2012, the registrant had 46,686,911 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding.

BIODRAIN MEDICAL, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Financial Statements	3

Condensed Balance Sheets March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011	3

Condensed Statements of Operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011	4

Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit from Inception to March 31, 2012	5

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011	6

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements	7

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	27

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	27

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings	28

Item 1A. Risk Factors	28

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	28

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	35

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	35

Item 5. Other Information	35

Item 6. Exhibits	35

Signatures	36

Exhibit Index	37

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Financial Statements

BIODRAIN MEDICAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash	$	22,393		$	122,985
Accounts Receivable		19,069			50,294
Inventories		91,937			97,605
Prepaid Expense and other assets		62,281			30,148
Total Current Assets		195,680			301,032

Fixed Assets, net		4,453			4,600
Intangibles, net		140,588			140,588

Total Assets	$	340,721		$	446,220

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities:
Current portion of convertible debt, net of discounts of $23,415 and $28,741 (See Notes 6,7, and 10)	$	1,227,042		$	1,055,559
Accounts payable		728,291			731,135
Accrued expenses		626,544			566,574
Total Current Liabilities		2,581,877			2,353,268
Long-term debt and convertible debt, net of discounts of $0 and $16,446 (See Note 7)		546,600			630,153

Liability for equity-linked financial instruments (See Note 9)		165,412			166,063

Stockholders' Deficit:
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 authorized, 38,636,433 and 32,074,000 outstanding		386,364			320,740
Additional paid-in capital		9,242,791			8,844,952
Deficit accumulated during development stage		(12,582,323	)		(11,868,956	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(2,953,168	)		(2,703,264	)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	340,721		$	446,220

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

BIODRAIN MEDICAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Period from April 23, 2002 (Inception) to March 31,
	2012			2011			2012
Revenue	$	22,635		$	-		$	135,297

Cost of Goods Sold		13,806			-			77,026

Gross Margin		8,829			-			58,271

General and administrative expenses		565,721			312,954			10,030,179

Operations expense		69,737			91,591			1,599,271

Sales and marketing expense		31,900			19,724			920,385

Interest expense		55,488			57,892			722,595

Loss (gain) on valuation of equity-linked financial instruments		(650	)		(4,728	)		(631,836	)

Total expense		722,196			477,433			12,640,594

Net loss available to common shareholders	$	(713,367	)	$	(477,433	)	$	(12,582,323	)

Loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(1.93	)

Weighted average shares used in computation - basic and diluted		32,664,003			16,557,867			6,503,773

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

BIODRAIN MEDICAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

PERIOD FROM APRIL 23, 2002 (INCEPTION)

TO MARCH 31, 2011

	Shares		Amount		Paid-in Capital			Deficit			Total
Issuance of common stock 9/1/02, $.0167 (1)		598,549	$	5,985	$	4,015		$	-		$	10,000
												-
Issuance of common 10/23/02, $1.67/share		2,993		30		4,970						5,000
Net loss									(51,057	)		(51,057	)
Balance 12/31/02		601,542	$	6,015	$	8,985		$	(51,057	)	$	(36,057	)

Issuance of common 2/12/03, $.0167 (2)		23,942		239		161						400
Issuance of common 6/11&12,$1.67 (3)		21,548		216		34,784						35,000
Net loss									(90,461	)		(90,461	)
Balance 12/31/03		647,032	$	6,470	$	43,930		$	(141,518	)	$	(91,118	)

Issuance of common 5/25/04, $.0167 (4)		6,567		66		44						110
Net loss									(90,353	)		(90,353	)
Balance 12/31/04		653,599	$	6,536	$	43,974		$	(231,871	)	$	(181,361	)

Issuance of common 12/14/05, $.0167 (5)		14,964		150		100						250
Vested stock options and warrants						2,793						2,793
Net loss									(123,852	)		(123,852	)
Balance 12/31/05		668,563	$	6,686	$	46,867		$	(355,723	)	$	(302,170	)

Issuance of common 5/16 & 8/8, $.0167 (6)		86,869		869		582						1,451
Issuance of common 10/19 & 23, $.0167 (7)		38,906		389		261						650
Issuance of common 12/01, $1.67 (8)		28,739		287		44,523						44,810
Vested stock options and warrants						13,644						13,644
Net loss									(273,026	)		(273,026	)
Balance 12/31/06		823,077	$	8,231	$	105,877		$	(628,749	)	$	(514,641	)

Issuance of common 1/30/07 @ 1.67 (9)		599		6		994						1,000
Value of equity instruments issued with debt						132,938						132,938
Capital contributions resulting from waivers of debt						346,714						346,714
Vested stock options and warrants						73,907						73,907
Net loss									(752,415	)		(752,415	)
Balance 12/31/07		823,676	$	8,237	$	660,430		$	(1,381,164	)	$	(712,497	)

Issuance of common 6/11 to 9/30, $.35 (10)		4,552,862		45,528		1,547,974						1,593,502
Shares issued to finders, agents		2,012,690		20,127		(20,127	)					-
Shares issued to pay direct legal fees		285,714		2,857		(2,857	)
Issuance of common due to antidilution provisions		205,899		2,059		(2,059	)					-
Shares issued to pay investor relations services 6/23/08, $.35		250,000		2,500		85,000						87,500
Vested stock options and warrants						354,994						354,994
Capital contributions resulting from waivers of debt						129,684						129,684
Net loss									(1,762,628	)		(1,762,628	)
Balance 12/31/08		8,130,841	$	81,308	$	2,753,039		$	(3,143,792	)	$	(309,445	)

Cumulative effect of adoption of EITF 07-5						(486,564	)		6,654			(479,910	)
Vested stock options and warrants						111,835						111,835
Shares issued 3/20/09 to pay for fund raising		125,000		1,250		(1,250	)					-
Shares issued under PMM in April 2009, $.50		700,000		7,000		343,000						350,000
Shares issued under PPM in May 2009, $.50		220,000		2,200		107,800						110,000
Shares issued under PPM in June 2009, $.50		50,000		500		24,500						25,000
Shares issued under PPM in August 2009, $.50		80,000		800		39,200						40,000
Shares issued under PPM in September 2009, $.50		150,000		1,500		73,500						75,000
Shares issued to directors, management and consultant in August 2009, $.50		797,810		7,978		390,927						398,905
Shares issued to finder in September 2009, $.50		100,000		1,000		49,000						50,000
Capital contributions resulting from waivers of debt						84,600						84,600
Value of equity-linked financial instruments issued in connection with PPMs						(222,296	)					(222,296	)
Value of equity instruments issued with debt						30,150						30,150
Shares issued to consultant for fund raising		30,000		300		(300	)					-
Shares issued under PPM in November 2009, $.50		50,000		500		24,500						25,000
Shares issued upon conversion of debt and interest, $.27		935,446		9,354		247,100						256,454
Shares issued upon conversion of shareholder note, $.35		14,024		140		4,766						4,906
Net loss									(2,892,230	)		(2,892,230	)
Balance 12/31/09		11,383,121	$	113,830	$	3,573,507		$	(6,029,368	)	$	(2,342,030	)

Shares issued in March 2010 under PPM, $.50		174,550		1,746		85,529						87,275
Shares issued to consultants for IR and consulting, $.50		374,090		3,741		183,304						187,045
Value of equity instruments issued for consulting services						354,602						354,602
Vested stock options and warrants						11,382						11,382
Value of equity-linked financial instruments issued in connection with PPM in first quarter						(25,553	)					(25,553	)
Shares issued in April 2010 under PPM, $.50		180,000		1,800		88,200						90,000
Shares issued in May 2010 to consultant, $.50		12,850		129		6,296						6,425
Shares issued in May 2010 to 2008 investors as a penalty for late registration of 4,552,862 shares, $.50		710,248		7,102		348,022						355,124
Value of equity instruments issued with debt						119,474						119,474
Value of equity-linked financial instruments issued in connection with PPM in second quarter						(31,332	)					(31,332	)
Value of equity-linked financial instruments issued in connection with PPM in third quarter						(31,506	)					(31,506	)
Shares issued in September 2010 under PPM, $.10		250,000		2,500		22,500						25,000
Shares issued to consultants in third quarter at $.22 per share		488,860		4,889		102,660						107,549
Shares issued in November 2010 upon exercise of warrants at $.135 per share		128,571		1,286		16,071						17,357
Shares issued in November 2010 to directors as compensation at $.15 per share		300,000		3,000		42,000						45,000
Vested stock options in fourth quarter						161,107						161,107
Equity instruments issued to consultants in fourth quarter						26,234						26,234
Net loss									(1,352,709	)		(1,352,709	)
Balance 12/31/2010		14,002,290	$	140,023	$	5,052,497		$	(7,382,077	)	$	(2,189,557	)
Value of equity instruments issued with debt in first quarter						47,908						47,908
Shares issued in first quarter at $.075 per share under PPM		5,333,334		53,334		346,666						400,000
Shares issued in first quarter at $.085 per share under PPM		1,294,117		12,941		97,059						110,000
Shares issued in first quarter at $.09 per share under PPM		200,000		2,000		16,000						18,000
Shares issued in first quarter at $.10 per share under PPM		150,000		1,500		13,500						15,000
Vested stock options and warrants in first quarter						268,549						268,549
Equity instruments issued to consultants in first quarter						91,504						91,504
Stock issued upon conversion of debt in first quarter		416,010		4,160		15,840						20,000
Stock issued to pay interest on debt in second quarter		158,036		1,580		20,920						22,500
Shares issued in second quarter at $.085 per share under PPM		588,236		5,882		44,118						50,000
Shares issued in second quarter at $.07 per share under PPM		500,000		5,000		30,000						35,000
Stock issued upon conversion of debt and interest		941,034		9,410		22,590						32,000
Vested stock options and warrants in second quarter						82,463						82,463
Equity instruments issued to consultants in second quarter						12,256						12,256
Vested stock options and warrants in third quarter						1,357,494						1,357,494
Equity instruments issued to consultants in third quarter						147,116						147,116
Restricted stock issued to consultants in third quarter		822,842		8,228		46,772						55,000
Shares issued in third quarter at $.06 per share under PPM		3,500,000		35,000		175,000						210,000
Shares issued in third quarter at $.07 per share under PPM		571,429		5,715		34,285						40,000
Shares issued in third quarter at $.20 per share under PPM		562,500		5,625		106,875						112,500
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options at $.01		100,000		1,000								1,000
Shares issued in fourth quarter at $.35 per share IR compensation		575,000		5,750		195,500						201,250
Shares issued in fourth quarter at $.20 per share under PPM		812,500		8,125		154,375						162,500
Equity instruments upon conversion of Accounts Payable in first quarter						20,000						20,000
Vested stock options and warrants in fourth quarter						229,132						229,132
Shares issued to private investor in fourth quarter at $.15 per share		1,546,667		15,467		216,533						232,000
Net loss									(4,486,879	)		(4,486,879	)
Balance 12/31/2011		32,074,000	$	320,740	$	8,844,952		$	(11,868,956	)	$	(2,703,264	)
Shares issued in first quarter to institutional investor upon conversion of Note Payable at $.1342 per share		59,613		596		7,404						8,000
Shares issued in first quarter to institutional investor upon conversion of Note payable at $.13 per share		107,692		1,077		12,923						14,000
Shares issued in first quarter to institutional investor upon conversion of Note Payable at $.088 per share		170,455		1,705		13,295						15,000
Shares issued in first quarter to institutional investor upon conversion of Note payable at $.0466 per share		343,348		3,433		12,567						16,000
Shares issued in first quarter to institutional investor upon conversion of Note Payable at $.0446 per share		269,058		2,690		9,310						12,000


Shares issued in first quarter to institutional investor upon conversion of Note payable at $.0466 per share		268,670		2,687		7,313						10,000
Shares issued in first quarter to institutional investor upon conversion of Note payable at $.0397 per share		428,212		4,282		4,218						8,500
Shares issued to a private investor in the first quarter at $.065 per share		4,615,385		46,154		253,846						300,000
Shares issued for consulting to the now Interim CEO in the first quarter at $.065 per share		300,000		3,000		16,500						19,500
Vested stock options and warrants in first quarter						60,463						60,463
Net loss									(713,367	)		(713,367	)
Balance 3/31/2012		38,636,433	$	386,364	$	9,242,791		$	(12,582,323	)	$	(2,953,168	)

(1) Founders shares, 1,000,000 pre-split

(2) 23,492 (40,000 pre-split) shares valued at $.0167 per share as compensation for loan guarantees by management

(3) Investment including 670 shares issued as a 10% finders fee

(4) For payment of patent legal fees

(5) Compensation for loan guarantees by management

(6) For vendor contractual consideration

(7) Employment agreements

(8) Investment

(9) Conversion of convertible notes by management

(10) Investment, "October 2008 financing".

See Notes to Financial Statements

BIODRAIN MEDICAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,						April 23, 2002 (Inception)
	2012			2011			To March 31, 2012
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net loss		(713,367	)		(477,433	)		(12,582,323	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		147			607			9,712
Vested stock options and warrants		60,463			-			2,727,763
Equity instruments issued for management and consulting		319,500			85,916			2,189,440
Stock-based registration payments		-			-			355,124
Capital contributions resulting from waivers of debt		-			-			476,398
Amortization of debt discount		21,773			27,999			307,057
(Gain) loss on valuation of equity-linked instruments		(650	)		(4,728	)		(631,836	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		31,225			-			(19,069	)
Inventories		5,668			-			(91,937	)
Prepaid expense and other assets		(32,133	)		2,278			(62,281	)
Notes payable to shareholders		-			-			(14,957	)
Accounts payable		(2,845	)		(26,303	)		1,294,890
Accrued expenses		59,970			24,259			738,404
Net cash used in operating activities:		(250,249	)		(367,405	)		(5,303,615	)

Cash flow from investing activities:
Purchase of fixed assets		-			-			(12,258	)
Purchase of intangibles		-			-			(142,495	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			-			(154,753	)

Cash flow from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term and convertible debt		149,657			150,000			1,433,623
Repayment of convertible debt		-			-			(100,000	)
Principal payments on long-term debt		-			(3,709	)		(75,667	)
Restricted cash in escrow		-			-			-
Issuance of common stock					543,000			4,222,805
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		149,657			689,291			5,480,761

Net increase (decrease) in cash		(100,592	)		321,886			22,393
Cash at beginning of period		122,985			9,383			-
Cash at end of period		22,393			331,269			22,393
Non cash transactions:

Common stock issued for accrued interest		-			-			111,860
Conversion of accounts payable to convertible debt		-			89,300			546,600
Common stock issued to satisfy debt		83,500			20,000			307,500
Stock warrant issued to satisfy accounts payable		-			-			20,000

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

BIODRAIN MEDICAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts presented at and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011 are unaudited)

NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations and Continuance of Operations

BioDrain Medical, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota in 2002. The Company is developing an environmentally safe system for the collection and disposal of infectious fluids that result from surgical procedures and post-operative care.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a stockholders’ deficit. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Management hired an investment banker in 2010 to raise an additional $3 to $5 million in new equity. The banker was unable to raise the expected $500,000 by September 30, 2010 and the balance within three months, but the Company raised approximately $229,000 in equity and $605,000 in convertible debt in 2010 and $1,154,000 in equity and $533,000 in convertible debt in 2011 through alternative means. The Company's April 1, 2009 510(k) clearance from the FDA to authorize the Company to market and sell its STREAMWAY™ FMS products is being received very positively. The Company has a private investor that has invested $125,000 in March 2012, with a commitment of another $175,000 to $475,000, and a potential additional investment subsequent to June 2012.

Recent Accounting Developments

We reviewed all other significant newly issued accounting pronouncements and determined they are either not applicable to our business or that no material effect is expected on our financial position and results of our operations.

Valuation of Intangible Assets

We review identifiable intangible assets for impairment in accordance with ASC 360- Property, Plant and Equipment ("ASC 360"), whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Our intangible assets are currently solely the costs of obtaining trademarks and patents. Events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable include, but are not limited to, a significant change in the medical device marketplace and a significant adverse change in the business climate in which we operate. If such events or changes in circumstances are present, the undiscounted cash flows method is used to determine whether the intangible asset is impaired. Cash flows would include the estimated terminal value of the asset and exclude any interest charges. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows over the estimated remaining life of the asset, the asset is considered impaired, and the impairment is measured by reducing the carrying value of the asset to its fair value using the discounted cash flows method. The discount rate utilized is based on management's best estimate of the related risks and return at the time the impairment assessment is made.

Our accounting estimates and assumptions bear various risks of change, including the length of the current economic downturn facing the United States, the expansion of the slowdown in consumer spending in the U.S. medical markets despite the early expressed opinions of financial experts that the medical market would not be as affected as other markets and failure to gain acceptance in the medical market.

Accounting Policies and Estimates

The presentation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Presentation of Taxes Collected from Customers

Sales taxes are imposed on the Company’s sales to nonexempt customers. The Company collects the taxes from customers and remits the entire amounts to the governmental authorities. The Company’s accounting policy is to exclude the taxes collected and remitted from revenues and expenses.

Shipping and Handling

Shipping and handling charges billed to customers are recorded as revenue. Shipping and handling costs are recorded within cost of goods sold on the statement of operations.

Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. There were no advertising expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred. There were no research and development expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, as amended by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (together, SAB 101), and ASC 605- Revenue Recognition.

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed and determinable and collectability is probable. Delivery is considered to have occurred upon either shipment of the product or arrival at its destination based on the shipping terms of the transaction. The Company’s standard terms specify that shipment is FOB BioDrain and the Company will, therefore, recognize revenue upon shipment in most cases. This revenue recognition policy applies to shipments of the STREAMWAY™ FMS units as well as shipments of cleaning solution kits. When these conditions are satisfied, the Company recognizes gross product revenue, which is the price it charges generally to its customers for a particular product. Under the Company’s standard terms and conditions, there is no provision for installation or acceptance of the product to take place prior to the obligation of the customer. The customer’s right of return is limited only to the Company’s standard one-year warranty whereby the Company replaces or repairs, at its option, and it would be rare that the STREAMWAY™ FMS unit or significant quantities of cleaning solution kits may be returned. Additionally, since the Company buys both the STREAMWAY™FMS units and cleaning solution kits from “turnkey” suppliers, the Company would have the right to replacements from the suppliers if this situation should occur.

Receivables

Receivables are reported at the amount the Company expects to collect on balances outstanding at fiscal year end. The Company has determined there will be no losses on balances outstanding at the three months ended March 31, 2012

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventory balances are as follows:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011

Finished goods	$	85,050	$	94,331
Raw materials		6,887		3,274
Total	$	91,937	$	97,605

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Estimated useful asset life by classification is as follows:

		Years
Computers and office equipment		3
Furniture and fixtures		5

Upon retirement or sale, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of patent costs. These assets are not subject to amortization until the property patented is in production. The assets are reviewed for impairment annually, and impairment losses, if any, are charged to operations when identified. No impairment losses have been identified by management.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740- Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and net operating loss and credit carryforwards using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to impact taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

The Company reviews income tax positions expected to be taken in income tax returns to determine if there are any income tax uncertainties. The Company recognizes tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on technical merits of the positions. The Company has identified no income tax uncertainties.

Tax years subsequent to 2007 remain open to examination by federal and state tax authorities.

Patents and Intellectual Property

In June 2008, the Company completed and executed an agreement to secure exclusive ownership of the patent from an inventor, Marshall Ryan. Mr. Ryan received a combination of cash and warrants, and he will receive a 4% royalty on STREAMWAY™ FMS (the Product) sales for the life of the patent. At the signing of the agreement, Mr. Ryan received $75,000 in exchange for the exclusive assignment of the patent. In addition, on June 30, 2009, Mr. Ryan, through his Mid-State Stainless, Inc. entity, was entitled to receive $100,000 as payment (currently recorded as an account payable with the Company) for past research and development activities. Should Mr. Ryan be utilized in the future for additional product development activities, he will be compensated at a rate of $95.00 per hour.

Mr. Ryan also received a warrant, with immediate vesting, to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $.35 per share. The warrant has a five-year term ending on June 30, 2013 and was assigned a value of $28,060 using a Black-Scholes formula. This amount was expensed as consulting expense in 2008 using a five-year expected life, a 3.73% risk-free interest rate, an expected 59% volatility and a zero dividend rate. Should there be a change in control of the Company (defined as greater than 50% of the Company’s outstanding stock or substantially all of its assets being transferred to one independent person or entity), Mr. Ryan will be owed a total of $2 million to be paid out over the life of the patent if the change in control occurs within 12 months of the first sale of the product; or $1 million to be paid out over the life of the patent if the change in control occurs between 12 and 24 months of the first sale of the product; or $500,000 to be paid out over the life of the patent if the change in control occurs between 24 and 36 months of the first sale of the product. There will be no additional payment if a change in control occurs more than 36 months after the first sale of the product.

Subsequent Events

An institutional investor began converting convertible notes in the first quarter 2012. As of March 31, 2012 the investor held convertible notes with an aggregate balance of $67,000. As of May 10, 2012 the investor has converted an additional $8,500 of the remaining principal amount of these convertible notes.

Interim Financial Statements

The Company has prepared the unaudited interim financial statements and related unaudited financial information in the footnotes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial statements. These interim financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the interim periods. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements and the notes thereto contained in the Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2012. The nature of the Company’s business is such that the results of any interim period may not be indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

NOTE 2 – DEVELOPMENT STAGE OPERATIONS

The Company was formed April 23, 2002. Since inception to May 10, 2012, 46,686,911 shares of common stock have been issued between par value and $1.67. Operations since incorporation have been devoted to raising capital, obtaining financing, development of the Company’s product, and administrative services.

NOTE 3 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT, STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

In connection with the financing completed in October 2008, the Company has affected two reverse stock splits, one on June 6, 2008 and another on October 20, 2008. In accordance with SAB Topic 4C, all stock options and warrants and their related exercise prices are stated at their post-reverse stock split values.

The Company has an equity incentive plan, which allows issuance of incentive and non-qualified stock options to employees, directors and consultants of the Company, where permitted under the plan. The exercise price for each stock option is determined by the Board of Directors. Vesting requirements are determined by the Board of Directors when granted and currently range from immediate to three years. Options under this plan have terms ranging from three to ten years.

Accounting for share-based payment

The Company has adopted ASC 718- Compensation-Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"). Under ASC 718 stock-based employee compensation cost is recognized using the fair value based method for all new awards granted after January 1, 2006 and unvested awards outstanding at January 1, 2006. Compensation costs for unvested stock options and non-vested awards that were outstanding at January 1, 2006, are being recognized over the requisite service period based on the grant-date fair value of those options and awards, using a straight-line method. We elected the modified-prospective method under which prior periods are not retroactively restated.

ASC 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model or other acceptable means. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model which requires the input of significant assumptions including an estimate of the average period of time employees will retain vested stock options before exercising them, the estimated volatility of the Company's common stock price over the expected term, the number of options that will ultimately be forfeited before completing vesting requirements, the expected dividend rate and the risk-free interest rate. Changes in the assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based compensation and, consequently, the related expense recognized. The assumptions the Company uses in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards represent the Company's best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management's judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, the Company's equity-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.

Since the Company's common stock has no significant public trading history, and the Company has experienced no significant option exercises in its history, the Company is required to take an alternative approach to estimating future volatility and estimated life and the future results could vary significantly from the Company's estimates. The Company compiled historical volatilities over a period of 2 to 7 years of 15 small-cap medical companies traded on major exchanges and 10 mid-range medical companies on the OTC Bulletin Board and combined the results using a weighted average approach. In the case of ordinary options to employees the Company determined the expected life to be the midpoint between the vesting term and the legal term. In the case of options or warrants granted to non-employees, the Company estimated the life to be the legal term unless there was a compelling reason to make it shorter.

When an option or warrant is granted in place of cash compensation for services, the Company deems the value of the service rendered to be the value of the option or warrant. In most cases, however, an option or warrant is granted in addition to other forms of compensation and its separate value is difficult to determine without utilizing an option pricing model. For that reason the Company also uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value options and warrants granted to non-employees, which requires the input of significant assumptions including an estimate of the average period the investors or consultants will retain vested stock options and warrants before exercising them, the estimated volatility of the Company's common stock price over the expected term, the number of options and warrants that will ultimately be forfeited before completing vesting requirements, the expected dividend rate and the risk-free interest rate. Changes in the assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based consulting and/or compensation and, consequently, the related expense recognized.

Since the Company has limited trading history in its stock and no first-hand experience with how its investors and consultants have acted in similar circumstances, the assumptions the Company uses in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards represent its best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management's judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, the Company's equity-based consulting and interest expense could be materially different in the future.

Valuation and accounting for options and warrants

The Company determines the grant date fair value of options and warrants using a Black-Scholes option valuation model based upon assumptions regarding risk-free interest rate, expected dividend rate, volatility and estimated term. For grants issued during 2008, the Company used a 2.0 to 4.5% risk-free interest rate, 0% dividend rate, 53-66% volatility and estimated term of 2.5 to 7.5 years. Values computed using these assumptions ranged from $.102 per share to $.336 per share. Warrants or options awarded for services rendered are expensed over the period of service (normally the vesting period) as compensation expense for employees or an appropriate consulting expense category for awards to consultants and directors. Warrants granted in connection with a common equity financing are included in stockholders’ equity, provided that there is no re-pricing provision that requires them to be treated as a liability (See Note 10) and warrants granted in connection with a debt financing are treated as a debt discount and amortized using the interest method as interest expense over the term of the debt.

Warrants issued in connection with the $100,000 convertible debt that closed March 1, 2007 created a debt discount of $40,242 that is being amortized as additional interest over its 5-year term. Warrants issued in connection with the $170,000 convertible “bridge” debt that closed in July 2007 created a calculated debt discount of $92,700 that was fully expensed over its loan term that matured April 30, 2008.

The Company issued $100,000 in convertible debt in October 2009 and issued a warrant, in connection with the debt, for 200,000 shares of common stock at $.65 per share. The Company determined that the warrant had an initial value of $30,150 that was treated as a debt discount and amortized as additional interest expense over the 24-month term of the note.

The Company also issued $200,000 in convertible debt in June 2010 and issued a warrant, in connection with the debt, to purchase 1,111,112 shares of common stock at $.46 per share. The Company determined that the value of the June 2010 warrant is $96,613.This value is treated as a debt discount and amortized as additional interest expense over the 22-month term of the note.

The Company also issued $32,000 in convertible debt in September 2010 and issued a warrant to purchase 320,000 shares of common stock at $.18 per share. The Company determined that this warrant has a value of $15,553 that was treated as a debt discount and amortized as additional interest expense over the 18-month term of the note.

The Company also issued $16,800 in convertible debt in December 2010 and issued a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at $.084 per share. The Company determined that this warrant has a value of $7,232 that was treated as a debt discount and amortized as additional interest expense over the 24- month term of the note.

In January 2011, the Company issued three convertible notes of $50,000 each and also issued warrants to purchase 1,595,239 common shares at $.20 per share. The value of the warrants was determined to be $47,908 and is being treated as a debt discount and amortized as additional interest expense over the 24-month term of the notes.

For grants of stock options and warrants in 2011 the Company used a 0.34 to 2.44% risk-free interest rate, 0% dividend rate, 54-66% volatility and estimated term of 3 to 10 years. Values computed using these assumptions ranged from $0.0126 to $0.3412 per share.

For grants of stock options and warrants in 2012 the Company used a 0.38% risk-free interest rate, 0% dividend rate, 54% volatility and estimated term of 3 years. Value computed using these assumptions were $0.1090.

The following summarizes transactions for stock options and warrants for the periods indicated:

	Stock Options (1)					Warrants (1)
	Number of Shares			Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares			Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2005		17,956		$	1.67		20,950		$	2.62

Issued		23,942			1.67		71,826			0.85

Outstanding at December 31, 2006		41,898			1.67		92,776			1.25

Issued		5,984			1.67		28,502			0.35

Outstanding at December 31, 2007		47,882			1.67		121,278			1.04

Issued		1,243,292			0.20		5,075,204			0.45
Expired							(11,971	)		3.76

Outstanding at December 31, 2008		1,291,174			0.26		5,184,511			0.45

Issued		205,000			0.37		2,188,302			0.65

Outstanding at December 31, 2009		1,496,174			0.27		7,372,813			0.49

Issued		2,210,000			0.17		3,435,662			0.34
Expired		(207,956	)		0.43		(8,979	)		1.67
Exercised							(128,571	)		0.46

Outstanding at December 31, 2010		3,498,218			0.19		10,670,925			0.44

Issued		2,483,334			0.01		18,222,243			0.14
Expired		(83,941	)		0.73		(2,010,917	)		0.48
Exercised		(100,000	)		0.01

Outstanding at December 31, 2011		5,797,611			0.11		26,882,251			0.23

Issued							87,500			0.20
Expired		(382,716	)		0.01		(648,597	)		0.35
Exercised

Outstanding at March 31, 2012		5,414,895		$	0.12		26,321,154		$	0.21

(1)

Adjusted for the reverse stock splits in total at June 6, 2008 and October 20, 2008.

At March 31, 2012, 4,939,586 stock options are fully vested and currently exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $0.13 and a weighted average remaining term of 3.38 years. All warrants are fully vested and exercisable. Stock-based compensation recognized for the three months ending March 2012 and March 2011 was $60,463 and $0, respectively. The Company has $179,554 of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options that are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 years.

The following summarizes the status of options and warrants outstanding at March 31, 2012:

Range of Exercise Prices		Shares		Weighted Average Remaining Life
Options:
$	0.01		2,543,910		2.83
$	0.15		2,060,000		5.07
$	0.35		775,000		1.12
$	0.50		30,000		0.62
$	1.67		5,985		0.62
Total			5,414,895

Warrants:
$	0.01		200,000		3.69
$	0.02		71,826		2.20
$	0.075		8,657,746		2.09
$	0.10		2,328,572		1.68
$	0.12		500,000		2.08
$	0.13		631,429		1.53
$	0.15		1,333,333		1.98
$	0.16		500,000		2.02
$	0.17		1,882,353		2.02
$	0.18		200,000		1.86
$	0.20		2,532,739		1.73
$	0.25		1,375,000		2.49
$	0.35		350,000		0.86
$	0.46		4,028,606		0.70
$	0.65		1,729,550		0.41
Total			26,321,154

Stock options and warrants expire on various dates from April 2012 to July 2021.

Under the terms of the Company's agreement with investors in the October 2008 financing, 1,920,000 shares of common stock were the maximum number of shares allocated to the Company's existing shareholders at the time of the offering (also referred to as the original shareholders or the "Founders"). Since the total of the Company's fully diluted shares of common stock was greater than 1,920,000 shares, in order for the Company to proceed with the offering, the Board of Directors approved a reverse stock split of 1-for-1.2545. After this split was approved, additional options and warrants were identified, requiring a second reverse stock split in order to reach the 1,920,000 shares. The second reverse stock split on the reduced 1-for-1.2545 balance was determined to be 1-for-1.33176963. Taken together, if only one reverse stock split was performed, the number would have been a reverse stock split of 1-for-1.670705.

On June 6, 2008, the Board of Directors approved the first reverse stock split. The authorized number of shares of common stock of 20,000,000 was proportionately divided by 1.2545 to arrive at 15,942,607.

On October 20, 2008, the Board of Directors (i) approved the second reverse stock split pursuant to which the authorized number of shares of common stock of 15,942,607 was proportionately divided by 1.33177 to arrive at 11,970,994 shares and (ii) approved a resolution to increase the number of authorized shares of the Company's common stock from 11,970,994 to 40,000,000, which was approved by the Company’s shareholders holding a majority of the shares entitled to vote thereon at a special meeting of shareholders held on December 3, 2008.

The shareholders approved an increase in authorized shares to 80 million shares in an annual shareholder meeting held on June 22, 2010 and approved an increase in authorized shares to 200 million shares in a special shareholder meeting held on September 7, 2011.

Stock, Stock Options and Warrants Granted by the Company

The following table is the listing of stock options and warrants as of March 31, 2012 by year of grant:

Stock Options:
Year	Shares		Price
2007		5,985	$	1.67
2008		1,243,292		.01-.35
2009		105,000		.35-.50
2010		2,060,000		.15
2011		2,000,618		.01
2012		-		-
Total		5,414,895	$	.01-1.67

Warrants:
Year	Shares		Price
2006		35,913	$	.02
2007		-		-
2008		2,971,629		.02-.46
2009		1,568,207		.13-.65
2010		3,435,662		.01-.65
2011		18,222,243		.075-.25
2012		75,000		.20
Total		26,321,154	$	.01-1.67

NOTE 4 - LOSS PER SHARE

The following table presents the shares used in the basic and diluted loss per common share computations:

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Period from April 23, 2002 (Inception) to March 31,
	2012			2011			2012
Numerator:
Net loss available in basic and diluted calculation	$	(713,367	)	$	(477,433	)	$	(12,582,323	)

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic		32,664,003			16,557,867			6,503,773

Effect of diluted stock options and warrants (1)					-

Weighted average common shares outstanding-diluted		32,664,003			16,557,867			6,503,773

Loss per common share-basic and diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(1.93	)

(1) The number of shares underlying options and warrants outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011 are 31,736,049 and 24,053,958 respectively. The effect of the shares that would be issued upon exercise of such options and warrants has been excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because those shares are anti-dilutive.

NOTE 5 – INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes consists of an amount for taxes currently payable and a provision for tax consequences deferred to future periods. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

There is no income tax provision in the accompanying statements of operations due to the cumulative operating losses that indicate a 100% valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets and state income taxes is appropriate.

Federal and state income tax return operating loss carryovers as of March 31, 2012, were approximately $11,968,000 and will begin to expire in 2017.

The valuation allowance has been recorded due to the uncertainty of realization of the benefits associated with the net operating losses. Future events and changes in circumstances could cause this valuation allowance to change.

The components of deferred income taxes at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011

Deferred Tax Asset:
Net Operating Loss	$	2,792,000	$	2,626,000
Other		48,000		49,000
Total Deferred Tax Asset		2,840,000		2,675,000
Less Valuation Allowance		2,840,000		2,675,000
Net Deferred Income Taxes	$	—	$	—

NOTE 6 - CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE

The Company issued a convertible debenture to Andcor Companies, Inc. (“Andcor”) with principal of $10,000 and interest at 10.25% that originally matured in 2007. The debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the lower of $0.90 per share or the price per share at which the next equity financing agreement is completed, and is now re-set to $.35 per share. The convertible debenture has not yet been paid, but the maturity of the note was extended, in May 2010, to March 31, 2012.

NOTE 7 – LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt is as follows:

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Notes payable to two individuals, net of discounts of $0 and $1,341 with interest only payments at 12% to March 2012 when the remaining balance is payable. The notes are convertible into 285,715 shares of common stock in the Company at $.35 per share.		100,000		98,659
Note payable issued on October 26, 2009 to the parents of one the Company’s directors, with interest at 8% to March 31, 2012 and convertible into shares of common stock at $.35 per share.		100,000		100,000
Notes payable issued to two individuals in January, 2010. The notes bear interest at 8%, mature March 31, 2012 and are convertible into shares of common stock, at 50% of the weighted average closing bid price over any 10 consecutive days of trading.		100,000		100,000
Note payable issued on June 12, 2010 to the parents of one of the Company's directors, net of a discount of $1,756 and $14,931. The note bears interest at 12% to March 31, 2012, and is convertible into common stock at $.18 per share.		198,244		185,069
Note payable issued on June 14, 2011 to an institutional investor. The note accrued interest at 8%, during the three months ended March 31, 2012. The note was converted into shares of common stock.		—		63,000
Note payable issued on July 12, 2011 to an institutional investor. The note bears interest at 8%, matures April 16, 2012 and is convertible into shares of common stock at 60% of the average of the five lowest closing prices in any 10 day trading period. $20,500 was converted in the three months ended March 31, 2012.		17,000		37,500
Note payable issued on September 16, 2010 to an institutional investor. The note bears interest at 10%, matures March 15, 2012 and is convertible into common stock at $.18 per share.		100,000		100,000
Note payable issued on December 23, 2010 to the parents of one of our directors, net of a discount of $3,693 and $4,960. The note bears interest at 12%, matures December 23, 2012 and is convertible into common stock at $.084 per share.		13,107		11,840
Note payable issued December 31, 2010 to a law firm that accepted this note in full payment of their past due legal fees. The Note bears interest at 6%, matures December 31, 2014 and is convertible into common stock at $.15 per share.		457,300		457,300
Note payable issued on September 21, 2010 to the parents of one of our directors, net of a discount of $0 and $0. The note bears interest at 12%, matures December 23, 2012 and is convertible into common stock at $.18 per share.		32,000		32,000
Notes payable issued in January 2011 to three individuals, net of a debt discount of $17,966 and $23,954. The notes bear interest at 10%, have a 24 month term and are convertible into common stock at $0.084 to $0.10 per share.		132,034		126,046
Note payable issued January 1, 2011 to a law firm that accepted this note in full payment of their past due legal fees. The Note bears interest at 6%, matures December 31, 2014 and is convertible into common stock at $.15 per share.		89,300		89,300
On November 18, 2011 the Company issued a convertible note with an institutional investor at 8% interest convertible into common stock at 60% of the average of the five lowest closing prices in any ten day trading period. The note matures on August 21, 2012.		50,000		50,000
Total	$	1,388,985	$	1,450,714
Less amount due within one year		842,385		820,561
Long-Term Debt	$	546,600	$	630,153

Cash payments for interest were $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and $116 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Principal payments required during the 12 month periods ended March 31:

2013	$	1,250,457
2014	$	0
2015	$	546,600

NOTE 8 – RENT OBLIGATION

The Company leases its principal office under a non-cancelable lease that extends five years. In addition to rent, the Company pays real estate taxes and repairs and maintenance on the leased property. Rent expense was $13,110 in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and $12,174 in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The Company moved its headquarters on May 1, 2012. The rental management remains the same and the Company is operating on a month to month lease with no escalations.

NOTE 9 – LIABILITY FOR EQUITY-LINKED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company adopted ASC 815- Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”) on January 1, 2009. ASC 815 mandates a two-step process for evaluating whether an equity-linked financial instrument or embedded feature is indexed to the entity's own stock. It was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, which was the Company's first quarter of 2009. Many of the warrants issued by the Company contain a strike price adjustment feature, which upon adoption of ASC 815, changed the classification (from equity to liability) and the related accounting for warrants with a $479,910 estimated fair value of as of January 1, 2009. An adjustment was made to remove $486,564 from paid-in capital (the cumulative values of the warrants on their grant dates), a positive adjustment of $6,654 was made to accumulated deficit, representing the gain on valuation from the grant date to January 1, 2009, and $479,910 was booked as a liability. The warrants issued in 2011 do not contain a strike price adjustment feature and, therefore, are not treated as a liability.

The January 1, 2009 valuation was computed using the Black-Scholes valuation model based upon a 2.5-year expected term, an expected volatility of 63%, an exercise price of $.46 per share, a stock price of $.35, a zero dividend rate and a 1.37% risk free interest rate. Subsequent to January 1, 2009 these warrants were re-valued at the end of each quarter and a gain or loss was recorded based upon their increase or decrease in value during the quarter. Likewise, new warrants that were issued during 2009 and 2010 were valued, using the Black-Scholes valuation model on their date of grant and an entry was made to reduce paid-in capital and increase the liability for equity-linked financial instruments. These warrants were also re-valued at the end of each quarter based upon their expected life, the stock price, the exercise price, assumed dividend rate, expected volatility and risk free interest rate. A significant reduction in the liability was realized in 2010 primarily due to a reduction from $.50 to $.22 per share in the underlying stock price. The Company realized a slight increase in the liability for existing warrants during the first quarter of 2011 and 2012 primarily due to a reduction in the spread between the exercise price and the market price of the underlying shares, additionally; there was an increase in the liability due to the extension of some existing warrants.

The inputs to the Black-Scholes model during 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 were as follows:

Stock price		$ .08 to $.50
Exercise price		$ .01 to $.65
Expected life		2.0 to 6.5 years
Expected volatility		54% to 68%
Assumed dividend rate		- %
Risk-free interest rate		.13% to 2.97%

The original valuations, annual gain/(loss) and end of year valuations are shown below:

	Initial Value		Annual Gain (Loss)			Value at 12/31/09		2010 Gain (Loss)		Value at 12/31/10		2011 Gain (Loss)			Value at 12/31/2011		2012 Gain (Loss)			Value at 3/31/2012

January 1, 2009 adoption	$	479,910	$	(390,368	)	$	870,278	$	868,772	$	1,506	$	(88,290	)	$	89,796	$	7,534		$	97,330
Warrants issued in quarter ended 6/30/2009		169,854		20,847			149,007		147,403		1,604		(4,689	)		6,293		(2,763	)		3,530
Warrants issued in quarter ended 9/30/2009		39,743		(738	)		40,481		40,419		62		(1,562	)		1,624		(1,093	)		531
Warrants issued in quarter ended 12/31/2009		12,698		617			12,081		12,053		28		(724	)		752		(443	)		309
Subtotal		702,205					1,071,847
Warrants issued in quarter ended 3/31/2010		25,553							25,014		539		(5,571	)		6,109		(1,587	)		4,522
Warrants issued in quarter ended 6/30/2010		31,332							30,740		592		(6,122	)		6,714		(1,599	)		5,115
Warrants issued in quarter ended 9/30/2010		31,506							20,811		10,615		(44,160	)		54,775		(699	)		54,076
Total	$	790,596	$	(369,642	)	$	1,071,847	$	1,145,292	$	14,946	$	(151,118	)	$	166,062	$	(650	)	$	165,413

NOTE 10 – RELATED PARTY

The Company entered into agreements, in 2008, with our Chairman of the Board, Lawrence Gadbaw, and in 2009 with board member, Peter Morawetz, to pay Mr. Gadbaw $25,000 and Mr. Morawetz $30,000 upon the Company raising $3 million in new equity. Mr. Gadbaw will also be paid the balance, if any, due under his separation agreement from 2008. This amount was $46,000 upon signing the agreement in 2008, is payable at $2,000 per month, and $8,000 remains in accounts payable as of March 31, 2012. Mr. Morawetz will also receive a stock option for 75,000 shares at $.35 per share and Mr. Gadbaw will receive a stock option for 160,000 shares at $.35 per share upon the Company raising $3 million.

On March 28, 2012, the Company, entered into a Convertible Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2012 (the “SOK Purchase Agreement”) with SOK Partners, LLC (“SOK Partners”), an investment partnership. Josh Kornberg, who is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, and Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz are affiliates of the manager of SOK Partners. Pursuant to the SOK Purchase Agreement, the Company issued a 20.0% convertible note due August 2012 in the principal amount of up to $600,000. Principal and accrued interest on the note is due and payable on August 28, 2012. The Company’s obligations under the note are secured by the grant of a security interest in substantially all tangible and intangible assets of the Company. The SOK Purchase Agreement and the note include customary events of default that include, among other things, non-payment defaults, covenant defaults, inaccuracy of representations and warranties, cross-defaults to other indebtedness and bankruptcy and insolvency defaults. The occurrence of an event of default could result in the acceleration of the Company’s obligations under the note, and interest rate of twenty-four (24%) percent per annum accrues if the note is not paid when due. The balances of the Samuel Herschkowitz and SOK Partners notes are $240,000 and $134,657, respectively, as of the month ended March 31, 2012.

On March 28, 2012, the Company received an advance of $84,657 under the note, including a cash advance of $60,000 net of a prepayment of interest on the first $300,000 in advances under the note. The holder of the note is entitled to convert the note into shares of common stock of the Company at an initial conversion price per share of $0.065 per share, subject to adjustment in the event of (1) certain issuances of common stock or convertible securities at a price lower than the conversion price of the note, and (2) recapitalizations, stock splits, reorganizations and similar events. In addition, the Company is required to issue two installments of an equity bonus to SOK Partners in the form of common stock valued at the rate of $0.065 per share. In March 2012, the Company issued the first equity bonus to SOK Partners, consisting of 4,615,385 shares of common stock, with a second installment due within five business days after SOK Partners has made aggregate advances under the note of at least $300,000. Until the maturity date of the note, if the Company obtains financing from any other source without the consent of SOK Partners, then the Company is required to issue additional bonus equity in an amount equal to $600,000 less the aggregate advances on the note made prior to the breach.

As long as any amount payable under the note remains outstanding, SOK Partners or its designee is entitled to appoint a special advisor to the Company’s Board of Directors, who will be appointed as a member of the Board upon request.

On March 28, 2012, the Company signed an Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2011, with Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz (as amended, the “Herschkowitz Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the Herschkowitz Purchase Agreement, the Company issued a 20.0% convertible note due June 20, 2012 in the principal amount of $240,000 for previous advances under the note. The Company’s obligations under the note are secured by the grant of a security interest in substantially all tangible and intangible assets of the Company. The Company has previously issued to Dr. Herschkowitz an equity bonus consisting of 1,546,667 shares of common stock. An additional 7,500,000 shares were transferred to Dr. Herschkowitz effective in April 2012, upon the occurrence of an event of default on the note. Dr. Herschkowitz and the Company are currently in negotiations regarding other consequences of the default.

As long as any amount payable under the note remains outstanding, Dr. Herschkowitz or his designee is entitled to appoint a special advisor to the Company’s Board of Directors, who will be appointed as a member of the Board upon request. Pursuant to this authority, Josh Kornberg was appointed to the Board on March 9, 2012.

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

Our Company was incorporated in Minnesota in April 2002. We are an early-stage company developing an environmentally conscientious system for the collection and disposal of infectious fluids that result from surgical procedures and post-operative care. We achieved our first sale in June 2009 but have had only limited sales to date. Since our inception in 2002, we have invested significant resources into product development and in preparing for approval from the FDA. We believe that our success depends upon converting the traditional process of collecting and disposing of infectious fluids from the operating rooms of medical facilities to our wall-mounted Fluid Management System (“STREAMWAY™ FMS”) and use of our proprietary cleaning fluid.

Since inception, we have been unprofitable. We incurred a net loss of approximately $4,500,000 for the fiscal year ended 2011 and a net loss of approximately $713,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to a loss of approximately $477,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2012 we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $12,580,000. As a company in the early stage of development, our limited history of operations makes prediction of future operating results difficult. We believe that period to period comparisons of our operating results should not be relied on as predictive of our future results.

We have focused on finalizing our production processes and obtaining final FDA clearance to sell our product to the medical facilities market. We obtained FDA final clearance on April 1, 2009. We intend to sell the STREAMWAY™ FMS through experienced, independent medical distributors and manufacturer’s representatives, who we believe will enhance acceptability of the STREAMWAY™ FMS in the market. We have signed agreements with independent sales representatives and product installation organizations and are conducting training sessions, but we continue to recruit more independent sales representatives and installation companies to meet our potential future needs. We achieved our first billable shipment in June 2009 and sold five Streamway™ units in 2011. It is too early to know with a high degree of confidence how quickly, and in what amounts, new orders will develop.

Company Financing and Capital Plan

As of March 31, 2012, we have funded our operations through a a variety of debt and equity investments. We received a bank loan of $41,400, an equity investment of $68,000 from the Wisconsin Rural Enterprise Fund (“WREF”) and $30,000 in early equity investment from several individuals. WREF had also previously held debt in the form of three loans of $18,000, $12,500 and $25,000. In December 2006, WREF converted two of the loans totaling $37,500 into 43,000 shares of our common stock. In August 2006, we secured a $10,000 convertible loan from one of our vendors. In February 2007, we obtained $4,000 in officer and director loans and in March 2007, we arranged a $100,000 convertible note from two private investors. In July 2007, we obtained a convertible bridge loan of $170,000. In June 2008, we paid off the remaining $18,000 loan from WREF and raised approximately $1.6 million through our October 2008 financing. The $170,000 convertible bridge loan and the $4,000 in officer and director loans were converted into shares of our common stock in October 2009. During 2009, we raised an additional $725,000 in a private placement of stock units and/or convertible debt, with each stock or debt unit consisting of, or converting into, respectively, one share of our common stock, and a warrant to purchase one share of our common stock at $.65 per share.

In 2010, we raised approximately $605,000 from the issuance of convertible debt and approximately $220,000 from the sale of units of stock and warrants. The conversion price on the debt and the unit price of the stock and warrants ranged from $.10 to $.65 per share. In 2011 we funded our operations through private investors, largely consisting of convertible debt and notes, equaling $525,500, and by $1,386,000 from the issuance of common stock. This amount includes loans totaling $240,000 from Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz. In March 28, 2012, we issued a 20.0% convertible note due June 20, 2012 in the principal amount of $240,000 for previous advances. See Note 10 – “Related Party” to the Condensed Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of the terms of the convertible note purchase agreement.

In 2012, we are currently receiving advances on a convertible promissory note from SOK Partners, LLC, an investment fund affiliated with Dr. Herschkowitz and Joshua Kornberg, our Interim President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors, up to an aggregate amount of $600,000. Advances have totaled approximately $307,000 through May 7, 2012. See Note 10 – “Related Party” to the Condensed Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of the terms of the convertible note purchase agreement.

As of May 7, 2012, we have $682,000 in principal and accrued interest on debts that are past due and in default, including the $240,000 in principal amount under the note to Dr. Herschkowitz. We are attempting to persuade the holders of a portion of debt to convert it into common stock or to negotiate a restructuring of such debt. The holders of debt representing $382,000 in principal and accrued interest have threatened legal action against the company. If the Company cannot repay or restructure the indebtedness and if such holders commence legal action, the Company may be subject to litigation expense and possible judgments against the Company, and the holders could assert various remedies including forcing the Company into involuntary bankruptcy proceedings.

Even assuming we can successfully restructure our indebtedness, we do not expect to generate sufficient revenues in 2012 to fund our capital requirements. Our future cash requirements and the adequacy of available funds will depend on our ability to sell our STREAMWAY™ FMS and related products. We expect that we will require additional funding to finance operating expenses and to enter the international marketplace. We believe that we will need to raise at least an aggregate of $2 million from future financing in order to have sufficient financial resources to fund our operations for the next 12 months because of our cash flow deficit. We will attempt to raise these funds through equity or debt financing, alternative offerings or other means, and we will also endeavor to convert existing obligations into equity, settle such obligations or otherwise reduce their amounts. We are not planning on any significant capital or equipment investments, and we will only have a few human resource additions over the next 12 months.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates and Recent Accounting Developments Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our audited Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of our financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods presented, as well as our disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, fair value of stock-based compensation, fair value of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, income taxes, and contingencies and litigation.

We base our estimates and assumptions on our historical experience and on various other information available to us at the time that these estimates and assumptions are made. We believe that these estimates and assumptions are reasonable under the circumstances and form the basis for our making judgments about the carrying values of our assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results and outcomes could differ from our estimates.

Our significant accounting policies are described in “Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in Notes to Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We believe that the following discussion addresses our critical accounting policies and reflects those areas that require more significant judgments, and use of estimates and assumptions in the preparation of our Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements , as amended by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (together, SAB 101) and ASC 605- Revenue Recognition.

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed and determinable and collectability is probable. Delivery is considered to have occurred upon either shipment of the product or arrival at its destination based on the shipping terms of the transaction. Our standard terms specify that shipment is FOB BioDrain and we will, therefore, recognize revenue upon shipment in most cases. This revenue recognition policy applies to shipments of our STREAMWAY™ FMS units as well as shipments of cleaning solution kits. When these conditions are satisfied, we recognize gross product revenue, which is the price we charge generally to our customers for a particular product. Under our standard terms and conditions, there is no provision for installation or acceptance of the product to take place prior to the obligation of the customer. The customer’s right of return is limited only to our standard one-year warranty, whereby we replace or repair, at our option. We believe it would be rare that the STREAMWAY™ FMS unit or significant quantities of cleaning solution kits may be returned. Additionally, since we buy both the STREAMWAY™ FMS units and cleaning solution kits from “turnkey” suppliers, we would have the right to replacements from the suppliers if this situation should occur.

Stock-Based Compensation. Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted ASC 718- Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). Under ASC 718 stock-based employee compensation cost is recognized using the fair value based method for all new awards granted after January 1, 2006 and unvested awards outstanding at January 1, 2006. Compensation costs for unvested stock options and non-vested awards that were outstanding at January 1, 2006, are being recognized over the requisite service period based on the grant-date fair value of those options and awards, using a straight-line method. We elected the modified-prospective method in adopting ASC 718 under which prior periods are not retroactively restated.

ASC 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model which requires the input of significant assumptions including an estimate of the average period of time employees and directors will retain vested stock options before exercising them, the estimated volatility of our common stock price over the expected term, the number of options that will ultimately be forfeited before completing vesting requirements and the risk-free interest rate.

Because we do not have significant historical trading data on our common stock we relied upon trading data from a composite of 10 medical companies traded on major exchanges and 15 medical companies quoted by the OTC Bulletin Board to help us arrive at expectations as to volatility of our own stock when broader public trading commences. In the case of options and warrants issued to consultants and investors we used the legal term of the option/warrant as the estimated term unless there was a compelling reason to use a shorter term. The measurement date for employee and non-employee options and warrants is the grant date of the option or warrant. The vesting period for options that contain service conditions is based upon management’s best estimate as to when the applicable service condition will be achieved. Changes in the assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based compensation and, consequently, the related expense recognized. The assumptions we use in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards represent our best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management's judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our equity-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. See “Note 3 – Stockholders’ Deficit, Stock Options and Warrants” in Notes to Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.

When an option or warrant is granted in place of cash compensation for services, we deem the value of the service rendered to be the value of the option or warrant. In most cases, however, an option or warrant is granted in addition to other forms of compensation and its separate value is difficult to determine without utilizing an option pricing model. For that reason we also use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value options and warrants granted to non-employees, which requires the input of significant assumptions including an estimate of the average period that investors or consultants will retain vested stock options and warrants before exercising them, the estimated volatility of our common stock price over the expected term, the number of options and warrants that will ultimately be forfeited before completing vesting requirements and the risk-free interest rate. Changes in the assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based compensation and, consequently, the related expense recognizes that. Since we have no trading history in our common stock and no first-hand experience with how our investors and consultants have acted in similar circumstances, the assumptions we use in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards represent our best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management's judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our equity-based consulting and interest expense could be materially different in the future.

Since our common stock has no significant public trading history we were required to take an alternative approach to estimating future volatility and the future results could vary significantly from our estimates. We compiled historical volatilities over a period of 2 to 7 years of 10 small-cap medical companies traded on major exchanges and 15 medical companies in the middle of the market cap size range on the OTC Bulletin Board and combined the results using a weighted average approach. In the case of standard options to employees we determined the expected life to be the midpoint between the vesting term and the legal term. In the case of options or warrants granted to non-employees, we estimated the life to be the legal term unless there was a compelling reason to make it shorter.

Valuation of Intangible Assets. We review identifiable intangible assets for impairment in accordance with ASC 360- Property, Plant and Equipment (“ASC 360”), whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Our intangible assets are currently solely the costs of obtaining trademarks and patents. Events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable include, but are not limited to, a significant change in the medical device marketplace and a significant adverse change in the business climate in which we operate. If such events or changes in circumstances are present, the undiscounted cash flows method is used to determine whether the intangible asset is impaired. Cash flows would include the estimated terminal value of the asset and exclude any interest charges. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows over the estimated remaining life of the asset, the asset is considered impaired, and the impairment is measured by reducing the carrying value of the asset to its fair value using the discounted cash flows method. The discount rate utilized is based on management's best estimate of the related risks and return at the time the impairment assessment is made.

Recent Accounting Developments

See Note 1 - “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Condensed Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of recent accounting developments.

Results of Operations

Revenue. The Company recorded $22,600 of revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and $0 in revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The revenue in the first quarter of 2012 was for disposable supplies purchased by customers that acquired the STREAMWAY™ FMS units in 2011. The Company has recently begun installing Streamway™ units in hospitals for evaluation purposes and, in one case, for production purposes, and expects the revenue for Streamway™ units to increase significantly at such time as the hospitals approve the use of the unit for their application and place orders for billable units.

Cost of sales. Cost of sales in the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $13,800 and $0 in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The gross profit margin was approximately 39% for both the hardware and the cleaning solution kits in the three months ended March 31, 2012. As revenues increase, gross margins will depend on various factors including manufacturing costs and volume purchasing discounts on both the equipment and the cleaning solution. Over the next several quarters, increases in revenues are expected to lag increases in related costs related to increasing manufacturing and sales capabilities, as customers complete their evaluations and place orders for billable units and the revenues are collected.

General and Administrative expense. General and administrative expense primarily consists of management salaries, professional fees, consulting fees, travel expense, administrative fees and general office expenses.

General and Administrative (G&A) expenses increased by $253,000 from the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to March 31, 2011. The increase in the three month period was due to a $300,000 expense for investor stock compensation, a method of remuneration to an investor in lieu of cash by issuing stock in an amount equal to the expense, was recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $0 in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The increase was offset, in part, by a decrease of $40,000 in other professional fees expense. Total G&A expenses are expected to increase as we ramp up for increased sales and manufacturing, investor relations expenses and audit and legal fees

Operations expense. Operations expense primarily consists of expenses related to product development and prototyping and testing in the company’s current stage.

Operations expense decreased to $70,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $92,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The decrease in expense in the 2012 quarter is primarily due to a reduction in manufacturing supplies expenses. Operations expense in the next several quarters is expected to increase significantly as the Company expects to increase shipments of the Streamway unit as customers complete their evaluations and place orders for billable units. Although we are attempting to curtail our expenses, there is no guarantee that we will be able to reduce these expenses significantly, and expenses for

some periods may be higher as we prepare our product for broader sales, increase our sales efforts and maintain adequate inventories.

Sales and Marketing expense. Sales and marketing expense consists of expenses required to sell products through independent reps, attendance at trades shows, product literature and other sales and marketing activities.

Sales and marketing expenses increased to $32,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $20,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011. We replaced the VP of Sales, and incurred commission expense relating to current sales.

Interest expense.

Interest expense stabilized in the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011. There was a slight decrease, $2,000 in interest expense in the three-month period.

The (Gain)/Loss on revaluation of equity-linked financial instruments reflected a gain of $650 in the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to a gain of $4,728 in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The reduction in gain in the current periods resulted from a narrowing of the spread between the exercise price on warrants and convertible notes and the relatively stable, but low, market price of the underlying stock in recent months.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Capital Structure

We had a cash balance of $22,393 as of March 31, 2012 and $331,269 as of March 31, 2011. Since our inception, we have incurred significant losses. As of March 31, 2012, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $12,580,000. We have not achieved profitability and anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future. We expect that our operations expense, including product development expense, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses will increase, and as a result we will need to generate significant revenue to achieve profitability.

There is no certainty that access to needed capital will be successful. We have not depended on the future exercise of outstanding warrants to provide additional funding.

To date, our operations have been funded through a bank loan and private convertible debt of approximately $1,584,000 and equity investments totaling approximately $3,923,000. As of March 31, 2012, we had accounts payable of $728,000 and accrued liabilities of $627,000. See “Company Financing and Capital Plan” above.

Cash Flows

Net cash used in operating activities was $(250,000) for 2012 compared with net cash used of $(367,000) for 2011. The $117,000 decrease in cash used in operating activities was largely due to a $234,000 increase in equity instruments for management and consultants in 2012 compared to 2011and an increase of $60,000 in non-cash expenses compared to 2011, partially offset by an increase in net loss of $236,000.

Cash flows used in investing activities was zero for 2012 and 2011. There have been no investing activities since we invested in new furniture and patents in 2008. We will likely increase our cash used in investing activities in the next several quarters as we prepare to support the expected growth in sales.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $150,000 for 2012 compared to net cash provided of $689,000 for 2011. The decrease in 2012 was primarily the result of selling $543,000 less in common stock in 2012 compared to 2011. We expect to show additional cash provided by financing activities in the next few quarters provided we are successful in raising capital. See “Company Financing and Capital Plan” above.

Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our business and operating results during the periods presented.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not engaged in any off-balance sheet activities as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.

Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” that indicate certain risks and uncertainties related to the Company, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. The Company’s actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth below and elsewhere in this report. Important factors that may cause actual results to differ from projections include:

Inability to raise sufficient additional capital to operate our business;

Unexpected costs and operating deficits, and lower than expected sales and revenues, if any;

Adverse economic conditions;

Adverse results of any legal proceedings;

The volatility of our operating results and financial condition;

Inability to attract or retain qualified senior management personnel, including sales and marketing personnel; and

Other specific risks that may be alluded to in this report.

All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this report regarding the Company’s growth strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenue or losses, projected costs, prospects and plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this report, the words “will,” “may,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “plan” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements or other information contained herein. Potential investors should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking statements in this report are reasonable, the Company cannot assure potential investors that these plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. The Company discloses important factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from its expectations in the “Risk Factors” section of the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2010 and elsewhere in this report. These cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not required.

ITEM 4. Control and Procedures

Disclosure Controls

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the timelines specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and in reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covering this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in the rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, we have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by our internal controls. In connection with our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we identified the following material weakness in our internal control structure over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011;

In the 4th quarter of 2011, there was an improper gap in maintaining issuance of stock options and warrants discovered in account reconciliations at December 31, 2011. In particular there was a large adjustment converting equity value into compensation expense. These audit adjustments did materially affect our financial position and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Remediation of Material Weakness in Internal Control Structure over Financial Reporting

We are in the process of implementing remediation efforts with respect to our control environment and the material weakness noted above as follows:

We plan over the next quarter, to implement corrections to ensure that stock option and warrants are effectively recorded, filed, maintained and reconciled and reviewed for any discrepancies to avoid misstatements of our financial position or results of operations.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

In January 2012, Ms. Kirsten Doerfert, the former Vice President, Sales and Marketing of the Company, brought an action against the Company in the District Court for Dakota County, Minnesota. The action relates to the Company’s termination of Ms. Doerfert in February 2010. Plaintiff alleges breach of her employment contract and defamation. The action seeks compensation due arising from the alleged breach, attorneys fees and related costs, and injunctive relief regarding future statements by the Company. In February 2012, the Company filed its answer, requesting that the court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint and deny all relief requested in plaintiff’s complaint. The Company intends to vigorously defend this action.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

Not required.

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following is a summary of our transactions during the last three years involving sales of our securities that were not registered under the Securities Act:

On February 1, 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with Kirsten Doerfert, Vice President of Sales and Marketing, pursuant to which we granted her an option to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at $.35 per share with 20,000 shares vested immediately and increments of 20,000 shares vesting upon reaching certain performance milestones. In addition, we granted Ms. Doerfert a warrant, vested immediately, to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock at $.46 per share as compensation for her consulting services prior to becoming an employee.

On March 27, 2009, we issued 125,000 shares of common stock to Cross Street Partners/Morrie Rubin as compensation in connection with raising up to $500,000 in new equity prior to June 30, 2009.

On April 6, 2009, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at $.65 to Russell H. Yaucher for his $25,000 investment in the Company.

On April 14, 2009, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at $.65 to Chad A. and Marianne K. Ruwe for their $25,000 investment in the Company.

On April 20, 2009, we issued 200,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at $.65 to Dean M. and Carol L. Ruwe for their $100,000 investment in the Company.

On April 21, 2009, we issued 200,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at $.65 to Richard J. Butler for his $100,000 investment in the Company.

On April 30, 2009, we issued 200,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at $.65 to James Dauwalter for his $100,000 investment in the Company.

On May 5, 2009, we issued 20,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock at $.65 to Gregory B. Graves for his $10,000 investment in the Company.

On May 15, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Peter Morawetz, a co-founder of the Company, a significant shareholder and a member of the Board of Directors, whereby Mr. Morawetz agreed to waive unpaid consulting fees in the amount of $84,600, relating to 2006 and prior years and, in exchange, would receive a cash payment of $30,000 and an option to purchase 75,000 shares of common stock at $.35 per share upon the Company raising an additional $3 million in equity. Mr. Morawetz is not required to participate in any way in the effort to raise $3 million.

On May 21, 2009, we issued 200,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at $.65 to Richard J. Butler for his additional $100,000 investment in the Company.

On June 10, 2009, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock to Citigroup FBO John Villas for his $25,000 investment in the Company.

On August 5, 2009, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at $.65 per share to Arnold A. Angeloni for his $25,000 investment in the Company.

On August 18, 2009, we issued 30,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock at $.65 per share to Peter G. Kertes for his $15,000 investment in the Company.

On August 24, 2009, we issued restricted shares under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan to certain management and directors of the Company to reward them for past service and to incentivize them for future service. The shares are subject to forfeiture until the earlier of a Change in Control, as defined in the Plan, attainment of six consecutive quarters of a minimum of $250,000 in net income or attainment of a 30-day average trading volume of not less than 25,000 shares of common stock. The shares will be forfeited to the Company if none of these “acceleration events” occurs by the tenth anniversary of the grant date. The shares granted are as follows:

Peter Morawetz, Director		100,000 shares
Thomas McGoldrick, Director		40,000 shares
Andrew Reding, Director		20,000 shares
Kevin Davidson, Former President and Chief Executive Officer		300,000 shares
Chad Ruwe, Former Chief Operating Officer		200,000 shares
Kirsten Doerfert, Former VP Sales and Marketing		75,000 shares
David Dauwalter, Direct of Product Management		50,000 shares

The value of these shares was determined to be $.50 per share, and the expense for their grant was recorded in August 2009. In addition, on August 24, 2009, we issued 12,810 shares of restricted stock under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan and a warrant to purchase 18,207 shares of common stock at $.46 per share to Alan Shuler as partial compensation under his consulting arrangement with the Company. The warrant has a term of five years and the shares are subject to forfeiture until the earlier of a Change in Control, as defined in the Plan, attainment of six consecutive quarters of a minimum of $250,000 in net income or attainment of a 30 day average trading volume of not less than 25,000 shares of stock. The shares will be forfeited to the Company if none of these “acceleration events” occurs by the tenth anniversary of the grant date. The value of the warrant was determined to be $4,943 using the Black-Scholes valuation model with an expected term of five years, an expected volatility of 59%, a dividend rate of zero and a risk-free interest rate of 2.5%. The value of the restricted shares was determined to be $6,405 at $.50 per share. These expenses were recorded in August 2009.

On September 8, 2009, we issued 100,000 common shares to a consulting firm for their consulting services.

On September 8, 2009, we issued 10,000 common shares and a warrant to purchase 10,000 shares at $.65 per share to an investor for his $5,000 investment in the Company.

On September 8, 2009, we issued 10,000 common shares and a warrant to purchase 10,000 shares at $.65 per share to an investor for her $5,000 investment in the Company.

On September 25, 2009, we issued 20,000 common shares and a warrant to purchase 20,000 shares at $.65 per share to an investor for her $10,000 investment in the Company.

On September 25, 2009, we issued 30,000 common shares and a warrant to purchase 30,000 shares at $.65 per share to co-investors for their $15,000 investment in the Company.

On September 30, 2009, we issued 80,000 common shares and a warrant to purchase 80,000 shares at $.65 per share to an investor for his $40,000 investment in the Company. On March 5, 2012, the warrants were re-issued at $.13 per share to consultants for their consulting services.

On October 2, 2009, we issued 30,000 common shares and a warrant to purchase 30,000 common shares at $.65 per share to a consultant for their consulting services. On March 5, 2012, the warrants were re-issued at $.13 per share to consultants for their consulting services.

On October 15, 2009, we issued 3,000 common shares and a warrant to purchase 3,000 common shares at $.65 per share to consultants for their consulting services.

On October 15, 2009, we issued 2,000 common shares and a warrant to purchase 2,000 common shares at $.65 per share to a consultant for her consulting services.

On October 26, 2009, we issued a note, convertible into 200,000 common shares, and a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares at $.65 per share to co-investors for their $100,000 investment in the Company.

On November 10, 2009, we issued 50,000 shares of its common stock and a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $.65 per share to an investor for his $25,000 investment in the Company.

In January 2010, we issued 19,090 restricted shares of common stock under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan to a consultant as partial payment for his services.

In March 2010, we issued 350,000 shares of common stock as payment to three consultants for their investor relations consulting services.

In March and April 2010, we issued 274,550 shares of common stock and warrants for 274,550 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $.65 per share, to 9 investors for their $137,275 investment in the Company.

In April 2010, we raised $90,000 from the sale of 180,000 Units under a private placement at $.50 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock at $.65 per share.

In June 2010, we raised $200,000 from the issuance of convertible debt to the parents of one of our officers. The debt bears interest at 12%, is due March 31, 2012 and is convertible into share of common stock at $.25 per share. We also issued a warrant to purchase 800,000 shares at an exercise price of $.46 per share in connection with this debt. The proceeds of this debt were used, in part, to pay off a $100,000 note plus interest and prepayment penalty totaling $43,600 to Asher Enterprises.

In July 2010, we issued 225,000 shares of common stock to four consultants in connection with fundraising and investor relations activities on behalf of the Company.

In July 2010, we issued 13,860 shares of restricted stock under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan to our acting CFO in partial payment for his consulting services for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

In July 2010, we issued 238,860 shares of common stock, with a value of $.22 per share, to five consultants in exchange for fund raising, financial consulting and investor relations services.

In August 2010, we issued a $50,000 Convertible Promissory Note to an investor. The note bears interest at 8%, matures in May 2011, and is convertible into shares of common stock at 50% of the average of the three lowest closing prices in any 10 day trading period.

In September 2010, we issued a $100,000 Convertible Promissory Note to an investor. The note bears interest at 10%, matures in March 2012, and is convertible into shares of common stock at $.18 per share.

In September 2010, we issued a $32,000 Convertible Debenture to the parents of one of our officers. The note bears interest at 12%, matures in March 2012 and is convertible into shares of common stock at $.10 per share. We also issued a warrant to purchase 320,000 shares at $.46 per share, amended the note dated in June 2010 to reduce the conversion price from $.25 to $.18 per share and issued a new warrant to purchase 1,111,112 shares at $.46 per share to replace the initial warrant for 800,000 shares at $.46 per share.

In September 2010, we issued 250,000 common shares with a value of $.22 per share to an investment banker as partial compensation for their fund raising activities.

In September 2010, we issued 250,000 common shares to an investor in connection with his $25,000 investment in the Company. We also issued a warrant to purchase 250,000 common shares at $.17 per share. On March 5, 2012, the warrants were re-issued at $.13 per share to consultants for their consulting services.

On November 16, 2010, we issued 75,000 restricted shares, with a value of $.15 per share, to each of four members of the Board of Directors and also issued an option to purchase 85,000 shares at $.15 per share to the Chairman of the Board as compensation for their services on the board.

On January 7, 2011, we issued three convertible notes in the amount of $50,000 each to three individuals who had lent the Company $50,000 each. The notes bear interest at 10%, are convertible into shares of common stock at $.084 to $.10 per share and have a 24 month maturity date. We also issued warrants to purchase 1,595,239 shares of common stock at $.20 per share in connection with this financing arrangement.

On February 7, 2011, we issued 150,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock at $.20 per share to an investor in return for his $15,000 investment in the Company.

On February 8, 2011, we issued 200,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at $.20 per share to an investor in return for his $18,000 investment in the Company.

On February 11, 2011, we issued 666,667 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 666,667 shares of common stock at $.15 per share to an investor in return for his $50,000 investment in the Company. On March 5, 2012, the warrants were re-issued at $.075 per share to consultants for their consulting services

On February 14, 2011, we issued a warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock at $.15 per share to a consultant in return for their help in arranging financing.

On February 17, 2011, we issued 3,333,334 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 3,333,334 shares of common stock at $.15 per share (assigned to an affiliate of the investors) to two investors in return for their $250,000 investment in the Company. On March 5, 2012, the warrants were re-issued at $.075 per share to consultants for their consulting services.

On February 17, 2011, we issued a warrant to purchase 400,000 shares at $.075 per share to a consultant in return for their help in raising funds.

On February 23, 2011, we issued 181,818 shares of common stock as a result of an institutional lender converting $10,000 in debt into shares of common stock at a price determined by a formula in the loan agreement.

On March 3, 2011, we issued a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares at $.10 per share to a consultant for their support in selling the Company's products.

On March 7, 2011, we issued warrants to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock at $.10 per share to three individuals in return for their consulting services.

On March 15, 2011, we issued a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares at $.10 per share to a consultant as a partial payment of his prior executive recruiting services.

On March 15, 2011, we issued 588,235 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 588,235 shares of common stock at $.17 per share to an investor in return for his $50,000 investment in the Company.

On March 17, 2011, we issued 416,010 shares of common stock as a result of an institutional lender converting $20,000 in debt into shares of common stock at a price determined by a formula in the loan agreement.

On March 23, 2011, we issued 117,647 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 117,647 shares of common stock at $.17 per share to an investor in return for his $10,000 investment in the Company.

On March 23, 2011, we issued 1,333,333 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 1,333,333 shares of common stock at $.15 per share to an investor in return for his $100,000 investment in the Company.

On March 25, 2011, we issued a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at $.16 per share to a consultant in exchange for investor relations services.

On March 28, 2011, we issued 588,235 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 588,235 shares of common stock at $.17 per share to an investor in return for his $50,000 investment in the Company.

On April 14, 2011, we issued 83,333 shares of common stock to the holder of a $100,000 convertible note as payment of prepaid interest as required under terms of the note.

On April 19, 2011, we issued 204,604 shares of common stock as a result of an institutional lender converting $8,000 of debt into shares of common stock at a price determined by a formula in the loan agreement.

On April 21, 2011, we issued 294,118 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 294,118 shares at $.17 per share to an investor in return for his $25,000 investment in the Company.

On April 22, 2011, we issued 75,000 shares of common stock to the holder of a $50,000 convertible note as payment of prepaid interest as required under terms of the note.

On May 2, 2011, we issued 294,118 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 294,118 shares at $.085 per share to an investor in return for his $25,000 investment in the Company.

On May 16, 2011, we issued 485,437 shares of common stock as a result of an institutional lender converting $15,000 in debt into shares of common stock at a price determined by a formula in the loan agreement

On May 23, 2011, we issued 250,696 shares of common stock as a result of an institutional lender converting $7,000 in debt and $2,000 of accrued interest into shares of common stock at a price determined by a formula in the loan agreement

On May 24, 2011, we issued 500,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 500,000 shares at $.12 per share to an investor in return for his $35,000 investment in the Company.

On July 1, 2011, we issued 250,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 250,000 shares at $.075 per share to an investor in return for his $15,000 investment in the Company.

On July 5, 2011 and July 11, 2011, we issued 333,334 total shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 333,334 shares at $.075 per share to an investor in return for his $20,000 investment in the Company.

On July 12, 2011, we issued 571,429 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 571,149 shares at $.10 per share to an investor in return for his $40,000 investment in the Company.

On July 14, 2011, we issued 57,423 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 57,423 shares of common stock at $.10 per share to a consultant for his consulting services.

On July 26, 2011, we issued 1,250,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 1,250,000 shares at $.075 per share to an investor in return for his $75,000 investment in the Company.

On July 26, 2011, we issued 333,333 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 333,333 shares at $.075 per share to an investor in return for his $20,000 investment in the Company.

On July 26, 2011, we issued 333,333 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 333,333 shares at $.075 per share to an additional investor in return for his $20,000 investment in the Company.

On July 27, 2011, we issued 833,333 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 833,333 shares at $.075 per share to an investor in return for his $50,000 investment in the Company.

On August 2, 2011, we issued 166,667 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 166,667 shares at $.075 per share to an investor in return for his $10,000 investment in the Company.

On August 2, 2011, we issued 100,000 shares of common stock to an officer of the Company in connection with an exercise under a stock option agreement dated June 14, 2011.

On August 17, 2011, we issued 62,500 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 62,500 shares of common stock at $.25 per share to an investor in return for his $12,500 investment in the Company.

On August 31, 2011, we issued 475,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 475,000 shares of common stock at $.075 per share to a fund raising consultant.

On August 31, 2011, we issued 290,699 shares of common stock to a consultant as partial compensation for investor relations consulting work.

On September 15, 2011, we issued 500,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock at $.25 per share to an investor in return for his $100,000 investment in the Company.

On October 3, 2011, we issued 500,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock at $.25 per share to an investor in return for his $100,000 investment in the Company.

On October 6, 2011, we issued 100,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at $.25 per share to an investor in return for his $20,000 investment in the Company.

On October 6, 2011, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at $.25 per share to an investor in return for his $10,000 investment in the Company.

On October 11, 2011, we issued 575,000 shares of common stock to a consultant as sole compensation for investor relations consulting work.

On November 3, 2011, we issued 62,500 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 62,500 shares of common stock at $.20 per share to an investor in return for his $12,500 investment in the Company.

On November 8, 2011, we issued 100,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at $.20 per share to an investor in return for his $20,000 investment in the Company.

On December 20, 2011, we issued 1,546,667 shares of common stock at $0.15 per share to Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz in return for his $225,000 investment in the Company, and $7,000 Board Meeting Fees.

On February 3, 2012, we issued a warrant to purchase 87,500 shares of common stock to a consultant as compensation for consulting work.

On March 5, 2012, we re-issued a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at $.13 per share to an investor for consulting services. The original warrant was issued on June 23, 2008.

On March 6, 2012, we re-issued a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at $.13 per share to an investor for consulting services. The original warrant was issued on June 11, 2008.

On March 6, 2012, we re-issued a warrant to purchase 71,429 shares of common stock at $.13 per share to an investor for consulting services. The original warrant was issued on June 11, 2008.

On March 26, 2012, we issued 300,000 shares of common stock at $.065 per share to Josh Kornberg, currently a Director of the Company for consulting services.

On March 28, 2012, we entered into a Convertible Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2012 between the Company and SOK Partners, LLC (“SOK Partners”), an investment partnership. Josh Kornberg is an affiliate of SOK Partners. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we issued a 20% convertible note due August 2012 in the principal amount of up to $600,000. Advances have totaled approximately $307,000 through May 7, 2012. In April 2012, the Company issued the first equity bonus to SOK Partners, consisting of 4,615,385 shares of common stock See Note 10 – “Related Party” to the Condensed Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of the terms of the convertible note purchase agreement.

On March 28, 2012, we signed an Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2011, with Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz (as amended, the “Herschkowitz Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the Herschkowitz Purchase Agreement, we issued a 20.0% convertible note due June 20, 2012 in the principal amount of $240,000 for previous advances under the note. The Company has previously issued to Dr. Herschkowitz an equity bonus consisting of 1,546,667 shares of common stock. An additional 7,500,000 shares were transferred to Dr. Herschkowitz upon the occurrence of an event of default on the note See Note 10 – “Related Party” to the Condensed Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of the terms of the convertible note purchase agreement.

In April 2012, an institutional investor elected to convert a $63,000 convertible note into shares of common stock. The investor also elected to convert $29,000 of a $37,500 convertible note into shares of common stock.

Unless otherwise specified above, the Company believes that all of the above transactions were transactions not involving any public offering within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, since (a) each of the transactions involved the offering of such securities to a substantially limited number of persons; (b) each person took the securities as an investment for his/her/its own account and not with a view to distribution; (c) each person had access to information equivalent to that which would be included in a registration statement on the applicable form under the Securities Act; and (d) each person had knowledge and experience in business and financial matters to understand the merits and risk of the investment; therefore no registration statement needed to be in effect prior to such issuances.

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

As of May 7, 2012, we have $682,000 in principal and accrued interest on debts that are past due and in default, including the $240,000 in principal amount under the note to Dr. Herschkowitz. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition – Company Financing and Capital Plan.”

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. Other Information

None.

ITEM 6. Exhibits

See the attached exhibit index.

SIGNATURES:

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	BIODRAIN MEDICAL, INC.

Date: May 15, 2012	By:	/s/ Joshua Kornberg
		Interim President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX

BIODRAIN MEDICAL, INC.

Form 10-Q

The quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

Exhibit No.		Description

10.1		Convertible Note Purchase Agreement between the Company and SOK Partners, LLC dated March 28, 2012, including the form of Convertible Promissory Grid Note (1)

10.2		Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement between the Company and Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz dated as of December 20, 2011, including the form of Convertible Promissory Note (issued in the amount of $240,000) (1)

31.1*		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*		Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document**

101.SCH*		XBRL Extension Schema Document**

101.CAL*		XBRL Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**

101.DEF*		XBRL Extension Definition Linkbase Document**

101.LAB*		XBRL Extension Labels Linkbase Document**

101.PRE*		XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**

______________________

Filed herewith.

**	In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is deemed not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(1)

Filed on April 3, 2012 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joshua Kornberg, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BioDrain Medical, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2012	/s/ Joshua Kornberg
	Joshua Kornberg
	Interim Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joshua Kornberg, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BioDrain Medical, Inc.;

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2012	/s/ Joshua Kornberg
	Joshua Kornberg
	Interim Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BioDrain Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joshua Kornberg, Interim Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: May 15, 2012	/s/ Joshua Kornberg
	Joshua Kornberg
	Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer